Duke Gets It Wrong Again, Invites Injustice
57 Ways to Meet the Love of Your Life
When Female Aggression Turns Deadly
Recognizing the Real Relationship Deal
Can a Manwhore Ever Really Settle Down, Even If He Wants To?
Adonis Effect Review… You Can’t Be Serious!
How To Avoid Craigslist Casual Encounters Scams
NO MORE MACHU PICCHU!

The idea that 20% of women 22-24 are finishing college with 20, 30, 40, 50 male sex partners……I don’t know….hard to wrap my mind around it. I’ll tell you this, for the alpha guys at the top of pyramid, it literally must be like paradise, a non-stop smorgasbord of tail. I think they will pay a price too although they don’t realize it yet. I think men can have a lot of indiscriminate casual sex without suffering the emotional damage most normal women would, but they will lose the ability to appreciate. Sort of like what $10,000 feels like to a billionaire I suppose.
.
Wow.

Jess says:
December 22, 2010 at 9:08 pm
To Susan –
thanks for the whitelisting – I was beginning to think it was my connection.
.
To mike c-
disappointed to hear you tow the biology line. There is no reason behind men wanting more variation than women. It’s a convenient line by the boys ok, but it’s pure BS.. In fact new science suggests that naturally speaking girls are tuned to be more promiscuous than guys. How about that studs?
.
To all
I actually think one should limit numbers to reduce STD risk. Have a bit of fun at college, rubber up, marry a nice person that attracts and interests you.
As to lying about numbers, it’s tricky one. I never lied myself, in fact I recently discovered i had over estimated all these years when I did a thorough audit. I prefer total honesty in life but i do get the rationale here. What if I fell passionately in love with a puritan and I knew he would be scared by my 22 exes.? Big temptation to fib. How would he ever find out? I would like to think I would be honest and let the chips fall where they may.
I should point out I don’t have the slightest remorse about my sex life. I had some great times and life is for living. I learnt from good and bad experiences.

Mike C says:
December 22, 2010 at 9:23 pm
To mike c-
disappointed to hear you tow the biology line. There is no reason behind men wanting more variation than women. It’s a convenient line by the boys ok, but it’s pure BS.. In fact new science suggests that naturally speaking girls are tuned to be more promiscuous than guys. How about that studs?
.
I’m kind of wondering what your agenda is as well on this. You are playing fast and loose with the science/biology. The science clearly shows women are hypergamous and naturally SERIALLY MONOGAMOUS, not polygamous. Women are wired to bond with one man, want one man sexually, and eventually switch to a new guy down the road. Read the Langley book. Which means a guy has to work hard in a relationship during that itch to switch guys. But the science says women are absolutely NOT wired to have multiple sexual relationships at the same time. I’ve read some anecdotal stuff from women themselves about this wreaking havoc on their psyche. There is plenty of evidence of this. For example, women having affairs usually lose sexual desire for their husbands. Again, see Langley. You can see the experiments on this. There is absolutely no evidence to support any sort of “Coolidge effect” in females. It doesn’t exist.